Comments on: Favre: Back in Green Bay?

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:16:23 +0000

You completely misunderstand the difference between a lockout and a strike.
A strike is when players choose not to play under existing conditions, so teams have to find ‘replacement players’ who are willing to play under those terms.
A lockout is when owners choose to not allow team operations due to the conditions. The players (most) are under contract, if the owners allowed players into the facilities and ‘continued operations’ they would be obligated to fulfill those contracts and pay the players. If they told players to go home, they still would have to pay them.
This is not a strike, there are no ‘replacement player’ scenarios.

By: apackphan

apackphan — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:21:09 +0000

Capt. Grumpy … you are grumpy, aren’t you? Favre will be back one way or another … if for nothing else, but to retire his number. And I’m afraid McCarthy will still be around, but maybe not Thompson.

By: Capt. Grumpy

Capt. Grumpy — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:14:39 +0000

What the hell are you smoking der bubba. Farve hates the Ted aand Mike show. The bridge is burned. I don’t think
Brett will be back to retire is jersey until they leave. So no #4 jersey retirement party in the near future.
Grumpy

By: Huh?

Huh? — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:43:08 +0000

This has got to be one of the most retarded theories ever to float around.
FYI, Edgar Bennett is the wide receivers coach for the Packers so I’m pretty sure he won’t be giving up on his rising coaching career to play with Keanu Reeves and the rest of the replacements.

By: NP

NP — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:31:18 +0000

This is by far… the stupidest thing anyone could possibly imagine…