<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look ahead, post-lockout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/</link>
	<description>A Green Bay Packers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarynfor 12</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarynfor 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=5534#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>A question posed as food for thought,&quot;Since Barnett was the defensive QB and Hawks play during those years were never up to par for a 1st rd pick and since taking over those duties and the explosion of his play since,is it possible that Barnett was really a hindrance moreso than the benefit many contrived him to be&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question posed as food for thought,&#8221;Since Barnett was the defensive QB and Hawks play during those years were never up to par for a 1st rd pick and since taking over those duties and the explosion of his play since,is it possible that Barnett was really a hindrance moreso than the benefit many contrived him to be&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarynfor 12</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/comment-page-1/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarynfor 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=5534#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>Barnett is an enigma.I can&#039;t to this day yet,figure out what it is or what he really did to acquire some of the stardom emblazened onto him and how some still feel he can/does still shine.

I&#039;m sure TT will find a 4-3 team that can easily be duped into giving us a 4th rd pick for him,which would be a great steal since that seems to be right in TTs wheel house in the draft that many a fan go agog over one way or another.

I would look to Carolina,S.Diego,Wash as possible dupes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barnett is an enigma.I can&#8217;t to this day yet,figure out what it is or what he really did to acquire some of the stardom emblazened onto him and how some still feel he can/does still shine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure TT will find a 4-3 team that can easily be duped into giving us a 4th rd pick for him,which would be a great steal since that seems to be right in TTs wheel house in the draft that many a fan go agog over one way or another.</p>
<p>I would look to Carolina,S.Diego,Wash as possible dupes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apackphan</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/comment-page-1/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>apackphan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=5534#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>Good take on the situation ... I also agree that Barnett could be a great candidate for trade bait ... for what? I&#039;m not sure ... a quality player at any position to add even more depth would be a good thing. 
Tauscher, I feel, would be a great player to keep around, if for nothing else but as a leader in the locker room. He is well respected by his teammates and would make a great failsafe should Bulaga or even one of the guards go down. I think he could probably play anywhere with the exception of left tackle. Anyway, I say keep him for one more year and let him retire with two rings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good take on the situation &#8230; I also agree that Barnett could be a great candidate for trade bait &#8230; for what? I&#8217;m not sure &#8230; a quality player at any position to add even more depth would be a good thing.<br />
Tauscher, I feel, would be a great player to keep around, if for nothing else but as a leader in the locker room. He is well respected by his teammates and would make a great failsafe should Bulaga or even one of the guards go down. I think he could probably play anywhere with the exception of left tackle. Anyway, I say keep him for one more year and let him retire with two rings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarynfor 12</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2011/07/11/a-look-ahead-post-lockout/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarynfor 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=5534#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>IMO,Barnett is the safest player to trade or release.With the rise in play of Bishop,Hawk finding his calling and what looks to be a nice find in Zombo,add in the return of B.Jones,Chiller and also IMO the good pick of Elmore makes Barnett very movable.

Tauscher is a different scenario in that Lang must show early that he is the player hoped to be.Sherrod is assumed to follow Chad but putting him as Rodgers protector too early leaves a sick feeling in my stomach as would having to rely on College to not allow Rodgers eggs to get busted.Newhouse can play some LT but...yeah,I&#039;m getting queasier as I type.

As to Tauscher,he has had his injuries but keeping him is a move that cannot be loosely discounted unless the money needed for that to happen is too much to count.

I also think that a restructuring of Grants contract is also warranted as 5.5 mil is a tad too much.But,overall we should be able to achieve the cap status without inflicting any serious gashings to the team as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO,Barnett is the safest player to trade or release.With the rise in play of Bishop,Hawk finding his calling and what looks to be a nice find in Zombo,add in the return of B.Jones,Chiller and also IMO the good pick of Elmore makes Barnett very movable.</p>
<p>Tauscher is a different scenario in that Lang must show early that he is the player hoped to be.Sherrod is assumed to follow Chad but putting him as Rodgers protector too early leaves a sick feeling in my stomach as would having to rely on College to not allow Rodgers eggs to get busted.Newhouse can play some LT but&#8230;yeah,I&#8217;m getting queasier as I type.</p>
<p>As to Tauscher,he has had his injuries but keeping him is a move that cannot be loosely discounted unless the money needed for that to happen is too much to count.</p>
<p>I also think that a restructuring of Grants contract is also warranted as 5.5 mil is a tad too much.But,overall we should be able to achieve the cap status without inflicting any serious gashings to the team as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.085 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 347/357 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: lombardiave.com @ 2013-06-19 05:42:33 by W3 Total Cache -->