<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reassessing the Packers Draft Needs After Jeff Saturday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/</link>
	<description>A Green Bay Packers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinlbyrd1988</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinlbyrd1988</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=8873#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Did this just imply GB is going to not resign Jennings? I kind of believed he had more than 2-3 years left in GB unless they don&#039;t see him valuable enough to resign or he overprices himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did this just imply GB is going to not resign Jennings? I kind of believed he had more than 2-3 years left in GB unless they don&#8217;t see him valuable enough to resign or he overprices himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reassessing the Packers Draft Needs After Jeff Saturday &#124; football-feed.com</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Reassessing the Packers Draft Needs After Jeff Saturday &#124; football-feed.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=8873#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>[...] to Original Content From LomdardiAve: read more   Related Articles   Share           About Author    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Original Content From LomdardiAve: read more   Related Articles   Share           About Author    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reassessing the Packers Draft Needs After Jeff Saturday &#8211; LomdardiAve &#124; Satellite Internet</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-4397</link>
		<dc:creator>Reassessing the Packers Draft Needs After Jeff Saturday &#8211; LomdardiAve &#124; Satellite Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=8873#comment-4397</guid>
		<description>[...] LomdardiAve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LomdardiAve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apackphan</title>
		<link>http://lombardiave.com/2012/03/24/reassessing-the-packers-draft-needs-after-jeff-saturday/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>apackphan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lombardiave.com/?p=8873#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Jon, this is a great look at how the Packers strategies have changed with a single free agent signing, which makes me wonder why Ted Thompson hasn&#039;t used free agency more as a way to fill holes that will take years to adequately fill with rookies from the draft. His draft and develop scheme has been effective, but this is a win-now league and it seems a combination of the draft and free agency is the best model. I think a good example of the best use of the draft and free agency can be found in New England. They continuously draft well, but also bring in quality veterans at needed positions. What does everyone think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, this is a great look at how the Packers strategies have changed with a single free agent signing, which makes me wonder why Ted Thompson hasn&#8217;t used free agency more as a way to fill holes that will take years to adequately fill with rookies from the draft. His draft and develop scheme has been effective, but this is a win-now league and it seems a combination of the draft and free agency is the best model. I think a good example of the best use of the draft and free agency can be found in New England. They continuously draft well, but also bring in quality veterans at needed positions. What does everyone think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/14 queries in 0.124 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 324/328 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: lombardiave.com @ 2013-05-21 05:28:16 by W3 Total Cache -->