Packers: 2010 Draft Grades

Jclombardi reviews Packers 2010 Draft grades. 

Simply, the Packers beefed up both sides of line.  Summary: 2010 Green Bay Packers draft picks.  Meanwhile, a brief review of the grades for this draft in the sports nation:

1. Todd McShay (Scout’s Inc.) B-.  The Packers’ best-case scenario was realized when top-four OT Bryan Bulaga fell to them at No. 23, but things fell apart from there.  DT Mike Neal (No. 56) is a reach. We’re not sure he’s a good fit as a 5-technique in their 3-4 scheme.

2. Mel Kiper (ESPN) B -.  Green Bay stuck to a good plan in the first round and got an ideal fit in Bryan Bulaga. In the second and third rounds, I think they may have reached a bit with Mike Neal and Morgan Burnett. Good players, but I think in both cases there were some better options. Neal’s skill-set isn’t a direct fit for the 3-4 they run. The grade goes up a notch with the addition of James Starks….A really good size-speed package when he’s right

3. Pete Prisco (CBS Sportsline) C+.  Best pick: Third-round pick Morgan Burnett is a playmaking safety who has the range you want in a modern-day player at that position. Questionable move: Taking defensive tackle Mike Neal in the second round over some other tackles will be a move watched closely. Was he worth a second-round selection? Third-day gem: Defensive end Wilson has a chance to stick as a seventh-round pick. He was a quality player at East Carolina. Analysis: Getting tackle Bulaga to fall to them in the first round was a good thing.  2nd round pick brings the grade down. They reached on that one.

4. James Joyner (Outside The Beltway) C.  The Packers needed to get younger at offensive tackle and did so with the Bulaga selection. Neal provides some bulk for the run defense. Burnett is a ball hawk at the back end. He intercepted 14 passes at Georgia Tech.

5. Nolan Nawrocki (Pro Football Weekly) B-.  The Packers landed a potential long-term blind-side protector to replace Clifton in LT Bulaga. The brute-strong Neal was tabbed to stack the edges of the Packers’ “30″ front. Thompson nabbed S Morgan Burnett early in the third round. All three players could see action readily. Fifth-round TE Quarless could develop into a solid role player. OT Newhouse fits the Packers’ zone-blocking scheme, as does one-cut runner James Starks. DE C.J. Wilson could also provide depth as a five-technique. The Packers could come away with three starters and recognized value throughout the draft.

COMMENTARY: For the Packers, it was a B- value draft. On this weekend, rookie orientation camp begins for the Packers.

Next Packers Game View full schedule »
Friday, Aug 2222 Aug7:00Oakland RaidersBuy Tickets

Tags: Draft Green Bay Packers NFL NFL Draft Winning Isn't Everything, It's The Only Thing

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Packers: 2010 Draft Grades - --

  • MarkSpizer

    great post as usual!

  • Pingback: Football Gameplan's 2010 NFL Draft Grades – Denver Broncos | NFL Pride | Denver Broncos NFL Announcer

  • Money Man

    I like the questions! Yes i’ve seen them other places but it’s cool you gathered them all up. Ooh and I don’t think I will slit my throat thanks for the suggestion though. NOT

  • college grants

    It’s posts like this that keep me coming back and checking this site regularly, thanks for the info!

  • cheap womens hollister long sleeved


  • Swiss Ball Exercises

    Terrific work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher!

  • 2010mlb

    it was a B- value draft

  • Cowboys jersey

    Thanks for posting this. Marion Barber Jerseys Very nice recap of some of the key points in my talk. I hope you and your readers find it useful! Thanks again Cowboys Jersey

  • overbestjersey

    Thanks for posting this. Cincinnati Bengals Jerseys nice recap of some of the key points in my talk. I hope you and your readers find it useful! Thanks again