Aug 9, 2013; Green Bay, WI, USA; Green Bay Packers offensive tackle David Bakhtiari (69) blocks during the game against the Arizona Cardinals at Lambeau Field. Mandatory Credit: Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

Cardinals at Packers Preseason Aftermath: Nowhere to Go But Up

Aug 9, 2013; Green Bay, WI, USA; General view of Lambeau Field during the third quarter of the game between the Arizona Cardinals and Green Bay Packers. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports


The Green Bay Packers took on the Arizona Cardinals in their pre-season opener last night in Green bay at Lambo (the Field … not the car). While my expectations for pre-season games are usually fairly low, this game was a real disappointment, ending Arizona 17 and Green Bay nothing.

I don’t have to be brainwashed to know that’s not a good final score. However, there were some positives and some negatives.

Let’s get to it.

Stat That Sticks

Green Bay’s longest run of the game – 8 yards (twice) by RBs Starks and Green. Then next longest runs – 7 yards (twice) by … wait for it … QBs Harrell and Young. So much for the vaunted new running attack. I get it. RB Lacy didn’t play and the staff wanted to see the veteran holdovers play a bunch. Well that’s what they saw. However, RB Franklin looked quick and RB Starks looked strong, if not a little slow.

Random Notes

Aug 9, 2013; Green Bay, WI, USA; Green Bay Packers wide receiver James Jones (89) grabs a pass against Arizona Cardinals cornerback Antoine Cason (20)at Lambeau Field. Mandatory Credit: Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

WR James Jones had a nice 50-yard pickup on the first drive. WR Walker had 5 nice catches with some tough YAC and at this point looks like he might be a keeper. TE Finley dropped what probably would have been a TD catch. Yes it was contested. No it wasn’t uncatchable. TE Williams dropped a couple of catchable balls but made a tough catch on a third down play. RB Franklin bobbled a screen pass. Had he caught it cleanly he might have had 6.

Quarterback play was inconsistent. QB Rodgers looked as sharp as ever, and he remains the undisputed king of the pending penalty downfield freebie shot. QB Harrell threw a really bad interception and was strip-sacked too. I guess what concerned me about Harrell more than anything else is how he carries himself on the field. He looks like a deer in the headlights too often. His face always seems to say he doesn’t really know what he’s doing out there. He’s had enough time in the system to be better than he is. QBs Coleman and Young didn’t do much to impress me either. Somebody needs to distance himself from the pack of backup QBs. Sooner would be better than later.

O line play seemed to deteriorate as the game went on, which while disappointing is predictable in preseason. The starters looked OK but their run blocking didn’t impress. LT Bakhtiari looked good to me. I watched him fairly closely and I saw no obvious whiffs or mistakes. I need to see more of him on tape but right now I think he has a shot to be the guy they need at LT.

D line play was about what I expected. DL Jolly looked like he was out of shape but he mostly got the job done. As a feel-good story and a strong comeback, I like Jolly a bunch. As a regular contributor on the D line I’m still not sure he makes the team. But tuck that jersey in 97.

The defensive secondary gave up some big passes and made some fixable mistakes doing it. CB House got housed and a TD pass was hidden from CB Hyde. House bit hard on a double move and Hyde lost the ball in the air. Correct and repeat. Hyde did make a couple of nice open field tackles.

The Rest of the Rest

Young wearing 13 just looks weird to me…Replay of the Starks TD that wasn’t conclusive enough to overturn the call on the field…Packers O averaged 3.4 yards per play…When Harrell comes in at QB everything seems to slow down- and not in a good way…I still like Ross for P and KO return duty…Jolly could/should have had a sack…Francois could/should have had a couple of them…CB Banjo led the team in tackles with 4…The Lambeau improvements look really nice. The best stadium in the NFL only got better.

So the game was a loss, a shutout, an eye-opener and a start. We’ve got a long way to go. While I’m concerned about the Packers brain trust putting so much faith in Bakhtiara after losing Bulaga for the season, at this point I’m OK with it. There are so many inured players on the team right now that it’s hard to envision what the team starting the regular season opener will look like. We’ll see.

Follow me on Twitter at @PackersTX and watch for insightful weekly pre-game and post-game analysis.

Next Packers Game View full schedule »
Thursday, Aug 2828 Aug6:00Kansas City ChiefsBuy Tickets

Tags: Green Bay Packers

  • Buckywunder

    This is one of the better reviews of the game I’ve seen — and I’ve had a look around. I hope you stick with it through preseason and then onwards after that.

  • Moveguy

    Here is some additional items that should have been discussed. Newhouse is a disaster as an OL. At best, he is the 7th OL on this team and worst is that we should have enough better players he does not make the 53. I say put killer Bs at the tackle positions, Bak and Barclay. I think that would much improve our run game.

    Also about the run game, let’s also account for the fact that the run game is going to dramatically improve when Rodgers is in the game full time, you have Jordy and Cobb at WR on the field. So defending the run with Graham at QB and no Jones, Jordy or Cobb on the field makes it a lot easier to stop our run attack.

    I think Jolly is all but a lock to make the 53. He was the only D lineman that was getting penetration regularly. Yes he will get himself into better shape and will start to make the play instead of almost making the play. But for a guy who had not played in 3 years, that was very good performance.

    Our MLBs need a lot of work. The secondary does not concern me as I think as they shake off the rust and we have our first team out there more, I think we are much better.

  • JaKa

    There are some things you cannot judge a player on just by watching them practice. Practice doesn’t mean anything as far as winning, other than being prepared for the “real thing”. Many players just go through the motions of the playbook, to make sure they follow the play properly. The difference between that and the real thing is playing for the yardage, stop & go, on offense or defense. The personnel people use the 1st game in pre-season just to get a look at certain players, where uncertainty is a concern. They might have a good player at a position that has had some problems, and a great draftee, that is unknown in the pro game. It’s time to get a look at them to see who’s better to get the job done. So one of the players gets the nod to start. That makes it Win/Lose for which ever players are “on the Fence”. I’m sure you’ll find that each week brings out fewer and fewer players in such status as this, each week. The last pre-season game, starters play the whole 1st half, (mostly) with uncertain players in the 3rd quarter, and keep or cut guys in the 4th quarter. Final cuts come a day or two after the last game, where by that time, the coaches know pretty much of who will be keepers or not. I hope that answers the questions you have, as well as your opinion of the game score, which means absolutly nothing. It wasn’t about W & L’s, it was about who gets the starters jobs for some positions that were doing, not too cool in the recent past and “what kind of talent” does certain players have in game situations, with a crowd screaming, yelling, and even quiet can affect players. a