View from the couch: How Eddie Lacy could add a dangerous dynamic to the Packers offense

A successful Eddie Lacy could lead to a well-stirred offensive attack by the Green Bay Packers. Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports photograph

In my inaugural addition of View from the Couch, or Maybe a Barstool I mentioned that Eddie Lacy could be the guy who stirs the drink in Green Bay. What do I mean by this, you ask?

Let me explain.

There is no question that the Packers offense is built around QB1, Aaron Rodgers. His precision passing, efficiency in the pocket, and ability to find the open receiver make him arguably the best quarterback in the NFL. The crux of the deal is that for the better part of the past three seasons Rodgers has had a below average offensive line in front of him and an average or below average running back lining up behind him. The result of this scenario has been pass rushers simply pinning their ears back and coming for Rodgers.

In addition to Rodgers always being under duress, defenses have been able to drop an extra man deep in pass coverage without concern for getting beat by a Packers’ running back. Eddie Lacy, on the other hand, brings to the table the ability to slow the pass rushers down and make defensive coordinators think twice about keeping an extra guy deep.

Aaron Rodgers pass to Jermichael Finley

Scott Rovak-USA TODAY Sports

With that said, if I were someone like Jermichael Finley, a guy who is in a contract year, I would see to it that Eddie Lacy is cared for. Because if Eddie Lacy can sniff the thousand yard mark, Jermichael Finley will see more Rodgers’ passes directed his way. That extra defensive man set deep will no longer be an issue, for the threat of Lacy in the backfield will keep defensive coordinators honest.

To take that analogy a step further, if the running game can flourish with Eddie Lacy in the backfield, which may lead to Finley gaining more opportunities, it could certainly have a trickledown effect (did I really just use that word) on the entire offense.

Randall Cobb and Jordy Nelson

Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

With the potential of Lacy being a productive part of the offense, defenses would no longer be able to key on Packer receivers. If the defense loads the box to stop Lacy, that opens up Finley. If opposing defenses target Finley, that in turn has the ability to open up Randall Cobb. If the defense tries to shut down Cobb, Rodgers has James Jones or Jordy Nelson on the outside. Not to mention a running back like Lacy, one who can make his own opportunities, takes a bit of pressure off the Packers once-again pieced-together offensive line.

Green Bay Packer quarterback Aaron Rodgers

Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

I’ll be the first to admit that I am a fan who is beaming with optimism and probably looking at things through glasses that may have a rosy tint to them.

But hey, when you have a quarterback that has the uncanny ability to put the ball in the hands of the open Packer receiver you begin every game with at the very least a fighting chance to win. If Eddie Lacy can prove to be a legitimate option at running back, the Packers may just have one well-stirred offensive cocktail.

In addition to blogging about the Green Bay Packers for Lombardiave.com, Patrick Hughes blogs about gardening at wheelandbarrowlandscape.com, running and the Portland Trailblazers at Oregon Sports News, and artisans and the connection economy at phughespdx.com.  

Topics: Eddie Lacy, Green Bay Packers, Jermichael Finley

Want more from Lombardi Ave?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Mike Brand

    they will have to flood the box because if lacy gets past the line it will be hard to stop him

  • Taryn Miller

    I know our run game isn’t or rather hasn’t been defined or redefined to date,but I’m not really losing sleep over it and that includes the possible nightmarish performance we may see in week one,which nobody should discard easily.

    I’m not discarding hopes for a solid showing in the run game but,whether we come away with a win or loss,I need to see a much more maligned defense against this Kaep-option.

    Production in regards to the run will come if meant to be and can be covered by the arm of Rodgers if short,what needs to be covered regardless of Rodgers is the defensive ability against the option for it is that,which will put us under the bus in the playoffs.

    The read options of SF,Sea,Was are not the kind that even a two TD lead can be sat upon…stopping it is a full games work for a defense and ours needs to show it can do it,regardless of how well Lacy performs in those games.

  • Pingback: Cheese Curds: Green Bay Packers News and Links for August 29, 2013 - NY Superbowl Insider

  • Robert

    I think our ones held up well against the Seattle ones and had Russell Wilson under control, barring major injuries we will be fine.
    What concerns me is lack of points on offense by our #1 unit which puts a heavier burden on our D.
    In a Packer perfect world, our offense finishes off drives with TDs allowing our D rest and a running game that will chew time off the clock late in games. I do see an edge to this team and hope it translates game 1 against 579.

  • Pingback: 'View From The Couch' - Green Bay Packers headed For Trouble In San Fran - Lombardi Ave - A Green Bay Packers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.

  • Pingback: Green Bay Packers Slow Start will bring Long-Term Success - Lombardi Ave - A Green Bay Packers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.